| 
				 Formed  August 1, 1995, Southeast Texas Medical Associates, LLP (SETMA, LLP) recognized  that excellence in 21st-Century healthcare was not possible with 19th-Century  medical-record methods, i.e., pencil and paper, or with 20th-Century methods,  i.e., dictation and transcription.   Therefore, in 1997, SETMA began  the process of adopting an electronic medical record (EMR).   
Prior  to the EMR, early In 1995, SETMA believed that 21st Century healthcare was going to be driven by quality performance.  SETMA rejected the old model of care  where the healthcare provider was the constable imposing health upon a passive  recipient, the patient.  Therefore, SETMA  developed a model of care where the patient is an active member of his/her  healthcare team and where the healthcare provider is like a consultant, a  colleague, a collaborator to facilitate healthy living, with safe,  individualized and personalized care for each patient.  SETMA’s model is driven by the fact that we  serve a population which had received disjointed, unorganized, episodic care,  focused upon things done to or for patients who have limited resources with  which to support their health care goals. 
The  first step in 1995 in the forming of what is now SETMA was the adoption of a team approach to patient  care.   (see The  SETMA Team and The SETMA Culture) That team focus will be the central part  of the story when the history of SETMA is written.   The  second critical decision was the EMR.   But, in SETMA’s history, May, 1999 will always  be central.   In the first week of May,  1999, only 100 days after SETMA deployed the EMR, four seminal events took  place which defined and guided SETMA’s future. 
The  first event took place the first week of May, 1999, when SETMA’s CEO announced  that the EHR was too hard and too expensive if all we gained was the ability to  document a patient encounter electronically.   When we began, it took a provider five minutes to create a chart  note.  Our CEO concluded EHR was only  “worth it,” if we leveraged electronics to improve care for each patient; to  eliminate errors which were dangerous to the health of our patients; and, if we  could develop electronic functionalities for improving the health and the care  of our patients and of population groups.   This was our transition from EMR to “electronic patient management”  (EPM).  
We  also recognized that healthcare costs were out of control and that EPM could  help decrease that cost while improving care.   Therefore, we began designing disease-management and population-health  tools, which included “follow-up documents,” allowing SETMA providers to  summarize patients’ healthcare goals with personalized steps of action through  which to meet those goals.  We  transformed our vision from how many x-rays and lab tests were done and how  many patients were seen, to measurable standards of excellence of care and to  actions for the reducing of the cost of care.   We learned that excellence and expensive are not synonyms.  In ten years, these steps would lead us to  begin public reporting by provider name on over three hundred quality metrics (Public  Reporting - Reporting by Type). 
The  second event was drawn from Peter Senge’s The  Fifth Discipline, from which we defined the principles which guided our  development of EMR and which defined the steps of SETMA’s transformation from  an EMR to EPM (Designing  an EMR on the Basis of Peter Senge's The Fifth Disciple).  These principles would also be the foundation  of SETMA’s ultimately morphing into a patient-centered medical home  (PC-MH).  The principles were to: 
  - Pursue  Electronic Patient Management rather than Electronic Patient Records 
 
  - Bring  to every patient encounter what is known, not what a particular provider knows 
 
  - Make  it easier to do “it” right than not to do it at all 
 
  - Continually  challenge providers to improve their performance 
 
  - Infuse  new knowledge and decision-making tools throughout an organization instantly 
 
  - Promote  continuity of care with patient education, information and plans of care 
 
  - Enlist  patients as partners and collaborators in their own health improvement 
 
  - Evaluate  the care of patients and populations of patients longitudinally 
 
  - Audit  provider performance based on endorsed quality measurement sets 
 
  - Integrate  electronic tools in an intuitive fashion giving patients the benefit of expert  knowledge about specific conditions 
 
 
In  2009, we would discover that these principles are essentially the principles of  PC-MH and that the ten years from 1999 to 2009 had prepared SETMA to formally  become a PC-MH.  Between 2009 and 2014,  SETMA became accredited as a medical home by the National Committee for Quality  Assurance (NCQA, 2010-2019), the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory  Health Care (AAAHC, 2010-2017), URAC (2014-2017)  and the Joint Commission (2014-2019) and in  doing this, SETMA became the only practice in America to be accredited by all  four organizations. 
Cortez - Fahrenheit 451 - Maginot Line 
The  third seminal event was the preparation of a philosophical base for our future;  written in May, 1999 and published in booklet form in October, 1999, this  blueprint was entitled, More Than a  Transcription Service: Revolutionizing the Practice of Medicine With Electronic  Health Records which Evolves into Electronic Patient Management.    The content of that booklet can be read  at:  More  Than a Transcription Service: Revolutionizing the Practice of Medicine And  Meeting the Challenge of Managed Care With Electronic Medical Records (EMR)  which Evolves into Electronic Patient Management.   
This  booklet was distributed to our practice and our community. It became our  declaration that we were going to succeed at this process at any cost and at  any effort.  Like Cortez, who scuttled  his ships on his expedition to Mexico so that there was no turning back, this  booklet was SETMA’s public declaration that there was no going back.  We were going to succeed.    Our charge to ourselves was and our counsel  to others is, “Don't give up!”   
Yet,  the key to success is the willingness to fail successfully. Every story of  success is filled with times of failure, but every story is also characterized  by the relentlessness of starting over again and again and again until the task  is master.  When we started our IT  project, we told people about what we were doing.  We called that our "Cortez Project."  
There  were other “named” initiatives in SETMA’s history in addition to the Cortez  declaration each of which defined an element of the dynamic of SEMTA’s  development.  There was the Fahrenheit 451 Initiative (the kindling  point of paper) where we recognized and declared that paper was too expensive  and too inefficient for record keeping and for transformation of  healthcare.  While we did not burn books,  we set our sights on getting rid of paper in our practice. 
There  was also the Maginot Line Initiative.  Like the fixed fortifications built by the  French after World War I  as an obstacle  to invasion by Germany and which fortifications were  defeated by the ability of mechanized  war-machines to “go around the line,” when confronted by a seemingly  insurmountable obstacle to our successful transformation, SETMA went around the  obstacles.  
As  we began defining and developing critical supports required for success in  Performance Improvement, we found them to be an active department of care coordination,  a hospital-care support team which is in the hospital twenty-four hours a day,  seven days a week, aggressive end-of-life counseling with all patients over  fifty, and active employment of hospice in the care of patients when  appropriate among others. 
The  fourth seminal event was that we determined to adopt a celebratory attitude  toward our progress.   In May, 1999, my cofounding partner was  lamenting that we were not crawling yet with our use of the EMR.  I agreed and asked him, “When your son first  turned over in bed, did you lament that he could not walk, or did you celebrate  this first milestone of muscular coordination of turning over in bed?”   
He  smiled and I said, “We may not be crawling yet, but we have begun.  If in a year, we are doing only what we are  currently doing, I will join your lamentation, but today I am celebrating that  we have begun.”  SETMA’s celebratory  spirit has allowed us to focus on the future through many lamentable  circumstances and has allowed us to press forward through many  disappointments.  Focusing on our  successes kept us moving forward and the cumulative effect was always success.  
Without  these conceptual and philosophical principles as a foundation, the adoption of  the “tools of SETMA” will not necessarily result in the same success as we have  experienced.   
  Between 1995 and 2017, SETMA  developed extensive Clinical Decision Support and Disease Management Tools.  Almost all of these are display at www.jameslhollymd.com under EPM Tools - Electronic Patient Management  Tools. All of these tools are available for use by anyone at no cost. 
One evaluation of SETMA’s website  was made by a healthcare executive, who said: 
“Thanks for the opportunity to review the Automated  Team Tutorial Workbook.  I found the information very  informative. I believe your organization is well ahead of the curve in  balancing the needs of the patient and the medical staff. I took the  opportunity to review both the documents you provided to me and the website  information. The information was informative and well organized. 
“...you have the most informative web site I have ever  utilized. Bravo, for sharing valuable information with the entire medical  community.”  
In  2009, SETMA adapted the IBM Business Intelligence software package, COGNOS, to  healthcare management.  At the root of this  project was Abraham Lincoln’s 1858 statement, “If we can first know where we  are, and whither we are tending; we can better judge what to do and how to do  it.”  Even if healthcare providers know  where they want to be or where they want to go, if they do not know where they  are in that progress or pilgrimage, they cannot successfully design a way to  get there.  A detailed explanation of  SETMA’s use of business intelligence and data analytics can be reviewed  at:  The  Importance of Data Analytics in Physician Practice.   Later, SETMA worked with IBM to help develop  the concept of Analytics Quotient.   (see:  Business  Analytics and Your AQ)   
The  power of SETMA’s us of analytics was seen in our eliminating of ethnic  disparities of care in diabetes and hypertension (see:  EHR,  Business Intelligence and Ethnic Disparaties of Care)  Key to analytics is “process analysis.” SETMA’s use of this capability Is explained in  the following study:  Process  Analysis and How Many Tasks Can You Get A Provider to Perform at Each Encounter?.   
SETMA’s  Model of Care was initially enunciated in 1999 but it has evolved and  expanded.  For a complete explanation of  this Model see:  SETMA’s  Model of Care Patient-Centered Medical Home: The Future of Healthcare  Innovation and Change.   
MIPS and MACRA 
This  foundation has prepared SETMA successfully to function in the new “performance  based payment model,” in “shared risk” relationships with insurance companies  and with CMS.  It has allowed SETMA to  prepare for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)  and Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA).   
In  fact, an analysis of SETMA’s strategies for transforming healthcare reveals that  what SETMA developed between 1999-2004 perfectly correlates with the MIPS  Categories of Scoring System: 
  - The methodology of  healthcare must be electronic patient management:
 
 
  - The content and  standards of healthcare delivery must be evidenced-based medicine:
 
 
MIPS  Quality (This is the extension of PQRI which in 2011 became PQRS and which in  2019 will become MIPS -- evidence-based medicine has the best potential for  legitimately effect cost savings in healthcare while maintaining quality of  care)   
  - The structure and  organization of healthcare delivery must be patient-centered medical home:
 
 
MIPS  Clinical Practice Improvement activities (This MIPS category is met fully by  Level 3 NCQA PC-MH Recognition).   
  - The payment  methodology of healthcare delivery must be that of capitation with additional reimbursement  for proved quality performance and cost savings: 
 
 
MIPS  Cost (measured by risk adjusted expectations of cost of care and the actual  cost of care per fee-for-service Medicare and Medicaid beneficiary)  
This  concept and SETMA’s preparation for MIPS and MACRA are summarized in the  following documents:  
Taken  in the context of SETMA’s Awards and Accreditation, this brief description of  our achievements and advancements helps anyone understand “from whence we have  come, and wither we are going.”   
			 |